CP3>Nash

Iceodu921 · 01-06-2008, 01:50 PM

Nash on the hornets niggas are in the lottery....

CP3=best pg in the nba.

DannyC · 01-06-2008, 02:59 PM

youre a knicks fan.

shhhhh

the Prince · 01-06-2008, 04:27 PM

the truth

Iceodu921 · 01-06-2008, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DannyC

youre a knicks fan.

shhhhh

Way to contribute to the thread homo.

As Seen On Tv · 01-06-2008, 06:31 PM

he will definitely have a better overall career, however i doubt he will win 2 mvp's, and he does need to improve his 3pt shooting, but i do agree that he is better

Hardkore the MC · 01-06-2008, 06:51 PM

no.

nash has been putting up the same numbers for about the last 4 seasons. this is paul's first season where he is putting up stats like he is now. i'll 100% agree with you when paul's stats are considerably better than nash's and leads his team to at least the second round of the playoffs, which it seems like they may do.

i must say nash's complete absence of any defensive skill makes that a fair opinion, though. nash doesn't even average one steal per game. *shakes head*

McCizoy · 01-06-2008, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Iceodu921

Nash on the hornets niggas are in the lottery....

CP3=best pg in the nba.

I been tryin to tell people for the last few weeks . His stat lines are crazy.

Chris Paul > everyone else

As Seen On Tv · 01-06-2008, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hardkore the MC

no.

nash has been putting up the same numbers for about the last 4 seasons. this is paul's first season where he is putting up stats like he is now. i'll 100% agree with you when paul's stats are considerably better than nash's and leads his team to at least the second round of the playoffs, which it seems like they may do.

i must say nash's complete absence of any defensive skill makes that a fair opinion, though. nash doesn't even average one steal per game. *shakes head*

nashs team has way more talent and experience, he stepped into a proven program, while paul is improving his team more and more everyday

MC propaganda · 01-07-2008, 02:43 AM

Chris paul is playing some serious ball, i dont know if im ready to take him over nash, but he definately made the topic debatable.

MC propaganda · 01-07-2008, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DannyC

youre a knicks fan.

shhhhh

if thats the case, atleast he roots for his team when they're not championship or playoff contenders like real fans do.

It took you three fucking allstars before you hopped on the bandwagon, how are you gonna make fun of someone for being a true fan?

Lets all go back and find danny's boston cheering from last year's post, oh wait.

Common_Sense79 · 01-07-2008, 02:45 AM

i honestly believe cp3 is better than nash was at his age. plus he brings serious D. he's still got some edges to sharpen (most notably his 3 pt shooting) but without that kid... N.O. would be in the midst of another catastrophe.

mos def looking forward to their game vs. the Lakers in a couple days.

paul = or > than nash

(stats from their last meeting were close)

mr madness · 01-07-2008, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Common_Sense79

i honestly believe cp3 is better than nash was at his age. plus he brings serious D. he's still got some edges to sharpen (most notably his 3 pt shooting) but without that kid... N.O. would be in the midst of another catastrophe.

mos def looking forward to their game vs. the Lakers in a couple days.

paul = or > than nash

(stats from their last meeting were close)

Way too early to compare these 2. Paul got a chance to be better, basically cuz Nash is 54, plus when Nash came in he was on the bench behind Kidd, and didn't get a chance until a couple years in, and Paul started immediately so you can't really compare this stage of they career. As far as playing right now, they are pretty even. they are the two PG's that's playing the best right now, but Paul>Nash, I can't go. Paul > Parker I'll cosign.

Iceodu921 · 01-07-2008, 03:29 PM

because nash wasnt good enough to start paul is and is a legit mvp candiate already nash didnt even deserve his mvps..

paul does more with less and is a much more complete player.

the Prince · 01-07-2008, 05:00 PM

nash would be lucky to get playing time if he were on the same team as paul

mr madness · 01-07-2008, 05:08 PM

Or it could be Nash got drafted to a team with a great point guard already, alot of players ain't start when they got drafted, that don't really mean too much. Kobe backed up Eddie Jones. Half the west all-stars didn't start coming into the league, that don't really hold too much. Paul is a MVP candidate, but Nash took a team from 29 wins to 60 in one year when he came to Phoenix, so lets let Paul get to the playoffs first before talking about how he does more with less.

Purple Haze · 01-08-2008, 03:31 PM

Chris Paul is the better atheltic talent.

Nash is the better PG.

His passing skills is far above anyone in the league, Kidd comes in a comfortable but distant second followed by whoever else.

Iceodu921 · 01-09-2008, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Purple Haze

Chris Paul is the better atheltic talent.

Nash is the better PG.

His passing skills is far above anyone in the league, Kidd comes in a comfortable but distant second followed by whoever else.

man you let that rasicism seep into your brain.

This pure pg is the biggest bullshit ive ever heard. The greatest pgs of all time do more than just pass. The only pg to be really succesful without being much of a scorer is J kidd.

not to mention cp3 has a better assit/to ratio than Nash and please with less offensive talent around him.

Paul is the better player which in turn makes him the better pg.

Hardkore the MC · 01-09-2008, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted

01-06-2008, 01:50 PM	#1 (permalink)
Iceodu921 Resident Sports Genius Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: wit ur girl Posts: 6,284	CP3>Nash Nash on the hornets niggas are in the lottery.... CP3=best pg in the nba.

01-06-2008, 02:59 PM	#2 (permalink)
DannyC has Murdersex Bees. Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: Boston, MA... TITLETOWN Posts: 32,687	youre a knicks fan. shhhhh __________________ *The only thing I've ever failed at is failing.*

01-07-2008, 02:45 AM	#11 (permalink)
Common_Sense79 Truth Peddler Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,134	i honestly believe cp3 is better than nash was at his age. plus he brings serious D. he's still got some edges to sharpen (most notably his 3 pt shooting) but without that kid... N.O. would be in the midst of another catastrophe. mos def looking forward to their game vs. the Lakers in a couple days. paul = or > than nash (stats from their last meeting were close) __________________ "Look, I've never had a dream in my life Because a dream is what you wanna do, but still haven't pursued I knew what I wanted and did it till it was done So i've been the dream that I wanted to be since day one" -Aesop Rock Last edited by Common_Sense79; 01-07-2008 at 02:47 AM.

01-08-2008, 03:31 PM	#16 (permalink)
Purple Haze Thelonious Monk, son Join Date: Jun 2000 Posts: 9,995	Chris Paul is the better atheltic talent. Nash is the better PG. His passing skills is far above anyone in the league, Kidd comes in a comfortable but distant second followed by whoever else. __________________ 18-1* best served chilled.

01-06-2008, 04:27 PM	#3 (permalink)
the Prince - Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 7,802	the truth

01-06-2008, 06:31 PM	#5 (permalink)
As Seen On Tv josh hamltn ur high pitch Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: 973/718 Posts: 21,759	he will definitely have a better overall career, however i doubt he will win 2 mvp's, and he does need to improve his 3pt shooting, but i do agree that he is better

01-07-2008, 03:29 PM	#13 (permalink)
Iceodu921 Resident Sports Genius Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: wit ur girl Posts: 6,284	because nash wasnt good enough to start paul is and is a legit mvp candiate already nash didnt even deserve his mvps.. paul does more with less and is a much more complete player.

01-07-2008, 05:00 PM	#14 (permalink)
the Prince - Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 7,802	nash would be lucky to get playing time if he were on the same team as paul