over and over again, you simply do not look at how important having a go-to sidekick and a good team/staff around you is
who cares if he was in the east? he was still all by himself on that squad playing a long, rigorous season with enough match-ups against western teams
he did go to the playoffs every year from 99-03 but was faced against a much higher seeded team. i'd say that qualifies as "stiffer competition".
t-mac has shown several times how clutch he can be... we just didn't get a chance to see it much when he was in orlando since their games usually weren't even close when they were losing.
kobe has flat-out had more opportunities to showcase clutch play for the simple fact that even when he had off-nights he still had shaq there for reliable dominance to keep the team afloat and games close so he could work his magic if need be.
mac was a great defender that showed potential of being scottie pippen-esque in toronto, but again... due to the overwhelming responsibility he had in orlando to score points, that part of his game wasn't focused on as much as it needed to be. and, part of that has to go to the coaching staff as well who outlined the gameplans. doc rivers stated numerous times that he did everything he could to lessen to load on t-mac on that end. orlando's interior was one of the most porous defensively i've ever seen as well, and that can strain a perimeter player.
kobe is a great defender, but he's still sometimey and chooses when to turn it on... usually in marquee match-ups so the statement resonates and is stuck in people's minds at the end of the year. defensive recognition is also based on reputation, and that's a good strategy to establish reputation.
whatever though
i'm done with this argument
i don't know why you always harped on it or even brought it up
now. why? to get at me somehow? my allegiance to t-mac isn't nearly as strong as it used to be. i don't care... i've accepted that his career, as a whole, is pretty much one big missed opportunity. a superb natural talent who had the potential to be really great but didn't because of a variety of reasons. any true basketball fan would look at that with a bit of disappointment and not look to always throw jabs at him, because true basketball fans want to see good basketball. and, good basketball means a lot of great players out there mixing it up with competitive games. the game suffers with one less out there playing up to his full potential or with the chance to get on the big stage and shine.
one can always look at andrew declerq and shaquille o'neal to find answers... that's not an excuse. it's a valid explanation.
andrew fucking declerq, and shaquille o'neal in his prime