|
The way I see it, if you post an explanation to the verse you've written, you're telling everyone that the verse can't explain itself.
Now, it could be left unhidden and the voters could say "Well, it's pretty stupid that you had to explain your verse, I'm voting for the other guy." or they could say "Well, I would have no idea what the point of your verse was without that explanation, and now that I see what you MEANT to get across, even though you didn't get it across, I see it's a dope idea so I'm gonna vote for you."
Which of those is fair? I'm still failing to see the wrongdoing in this situation, only thing I can see is that Fold's was edited and Shrugs was not, that's about as wrong as I see things. And as for the title being an explanation...how? Half the time the title is just the topic used, at least for me anyways, and in Baron's case in this particular situation.
Then again, I'm still waiting to see what was actually hidden. If he didn't touch the verse itself and just hid the explanation I'm sticking by my (and apparently a lot of other peoples') opinion.
__________________
The Republican Party Since the start of the Iraq war, 7 million Americans have died from ABORTION. [.txt] MASTERS/ the universe Yes, as in the entire universe.
|