Merry Christmas

[menaz]

LOL@ YOU DENYING THE TRUE MEANING BEHIND THE UNCAPPED STONE and EYE.
Dear god, think whatever you want azue, it's not worth it.

I said aspect of RA. I didn't say Aten was RA.

Science agreeing the nuclear furnace is the sun's core.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/dirtybomb/sour-nf.html NOVA is a reliable source. And no I don't believe you are Qualified at all to speak on this.




It's really just the opinion on how the sun's heat works Nuclear furance or Electoric Cosmology. Only the Nuclear Furance has been fact since 1939.

I told you jesus didn't exist. You swore up and down he did.
Probably just a multiple personality devils advocate game.

Believe whatever you want. I'm done talking to you, it's useless.

[Anidawehi]

Originally Posted by menaz

LOL@ YOU DENYING THE TRUE MEANING BEHIND THE UNCAPPED STONE and EYE.

I'm denying it because that's not what it means. See, the problem is when you look something up you only look for the source that supports what you believe.
You never look into the sources that do not support what you believe. Any Mason will tell you that is what it means. If you don't know a Mason, find one and ask him/her. They will tell you exactly what I've told you.

Dear god, think whatever you want azue, it's not worth it.

I said aspect of RA. I didn't say Aten was RA.

Everything was an aspect of Ra because the Ancient Egyptians connected everything to an attribute of Ra. That doesn't mean that certain aspects of Ra are not true. It simply means that Ra was not true.

Science agreeing the nuclear furnace is the sun's core.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/dirtybomb/sour-nf.html NOVA is a reliable source. And no I don't believe you are Qualified at all to speak on this.

You didn't even read those websites that I posted, did you?
You just went and found the a source that supports your argument and posted it.
You don't actually care about truth or knowledge. You just want to win an argument.

It's really just the opinion on how the sun's heat works Nuclear furance or Electoric Cosmology. Only the Nuclear Furance has been fact since 1939.

First it's opinion and then it's been a "fact" since 1939?
No, it has simply been a widely accepted "theory" since 1939.
It is not a fact, in the least. It is a fact that people accept it (in much the same way people accept religions), since 1939. But it is not a fact simply because people accept it. By that logic, Christianity and Islam are both factual and we KNOW that this isn't true.

I told you jesus didn't exist. You swore up and down he did.
Probably just a multiple personality devils advocate game.

Menaz, we've been arguing for several years now. Recently when I was playing a role with other members on here, yes, you did argue against Jesus. During THAT particular argument I was arguing that "Yeshua Bar Yosef" may have existed but Jesus did not. I said that I believe that a regular man/teacher named Yeshua Bar Yosef (The Nazarene) did exist, but that he was elevated to Son of God status later on by Rome. The •••ish Talmud does not deny that Yeshua Bar Yosef existed. The Talmud speaks of Yeshua Bar Yosef on numerous occasions and called him a "Magician" and "Son of Mariam's lover" (denying that he was Yosef's son). Yeshua's mother DID exist and she was a temple priestess.

Several years ago however, when you was still a Christian (before you began reading on Hinduism/Buddhism/Etc . . . I suggested that you read the "Book of Secrets" and you stated that you went to the book store and flipped through it.
I also suggested that you read the Tao Te Ching, and you later told me that you did. Time has now passed and you have discovered these things and are now trying to claim that you taught me these things . . . which of course is nonsense.

Now, I don't know if you have been affected by my numerous different characters on here or what . . . but I know that if you think back you'll remember me telling you about the Book of Secrets, Tao Te Ching, Etc. You'll recall that I was the one who told you about Hinduism and Buddhism and then you went in pursuit of them.

It's ok if we don't agree. But don't ever pretend that I'm following in "your" footsteps. That is simply rediculous.

Believe whatever you want. I'm done talking to you, it's useless.

It is useless. I make suggestions on reading material, you read them and then you come back and try to claim that you taught me about it or some silly shit. I don't know why you do this, but it is quite rediculous.

[Anidawehi]

Originally Posted by Murder Ink

so are you tryin to say that God's an energy that flows through us?

If you must call it God, then yes. I don't call it God.

If you get a chance, read the "Tao Te Ching" or find a book called, "Won Buddhism The Periodical." Taoists call this force "The Tao" . . . Buddhists call it "The Won."
Both Taoists and Buddhists use a circle to represent this force. Cherokee have the same symbol/fundamental beliefs.

This is the only God that exists. But it is not a God or even the God. It is bigger than any concept man has ever held of God. The closest that mankind has ever come to understanding this concept as a "God" is Akhenaten of Ancient Egypt who taught that there is only one God (Aten) and that he is everywhere. Akhenaten was the first Monotheist and was the man that the Hebrew story of Moses came from.

His symbol for Aten was the Sun Disk with the rays coming down as hands giving knowledge to mankind.

That makes sense but I still believe It has a mind that oversees everything, but it's strictly spiritual I think, idk it's confusing I think God sees everything and is all knowing and God evolves, and as it evolves we evolve in it's image till we reach what it wants us to then we start over, at least that's what I believe...idk dog I'm still learning lol

thanks for the links tho

We're all learning.

Those who claim to have it all figured out (Menaz) are full of shit.

[Sinnykal]

Originally Posted by Anidawehi

1. The same way one would go through life not believing in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny . . . using logic and reason.
2. Oh, ok
3. Right, I don't believe in "your" God so that makes me an atheist? If you had actually read this thread (before responding to it) you would know that I do believe in God. Just not your imaginary "man-in-the-sky" nonsense.

But hey, to each their own . . . right?
If belief in a superhero human being who walks on water, turns water into wine, multiplies fish and bread and raises himself from the dead . . . makes you a better human being, whatever. Unfortunately it rarely does. Belief in rediculous superhuman man-gods and a father figure God usually tends to make a person more divisive and racist as well as naive and weak minded.

You find it hard to believe that I (a logical human being with a rational mind) do not believe in something that there is no evidence "at all" for, and I find it hard to believe that you (a grown adult with a mind built for logical and rational thought) DO believe in something that you have absolutely no evidence for at all.

To abandon reason and logic for dogmatic childlike acceptance, is not only an insult to mankind . . . it places you below the animals. They don't have reason and logic. You do and you abandon it in order to feel secure in life.

Answer these questions for me:
1. Did Jesus Christ teach anything that had not been taught before? If so, what was it?
2. Was Jesus the first (supposed) "Son of God"? If not, how many were there before him that we know of?
3. Define God. If I were to ask you, "Do you believe in God?" and you said, "Of course." and then I asked you, "What is God?" . . . what would your answer be?
4. Has God ever spoken to you directly?
5. If somebody today told you that God speaks to them, would you consider them a prophet or a schizophrenic?
6. Is there even one archeological proof of ANY of the Biblical characters from the Old Testament or Jesus and his disciples? (Paul doesn't count, he wasn't a disciple. He was the mastermind [with the help of Philo] who created the religion of Christianity in Rome.) If so, provide a link to it, please.

If you are going to attack a thread, make sure you read it first. If you don't agree with it, know why you don't agree with it. If you are going to attack the person's statements, who created the thread, then make sure you know what you're talking about.

Your God does not exist.
Jesus Christ never existed.

Now prove me wrong.
And please don't use the Bible as your source because I'm really going to hurt your feelings if you do.

im not in the business of "proving people wrong" on what they believe specialy on the net...if you dont believe in "my GOD" then fine...it was no need for you to type out a book...your one of those people who need archeological proof so you wouldnt understand me anyway...i believe in what i believe in because i feel it...not because some man with a brush found some bones...hurt my feelings lol do you kid