Direct and Indirect Effects of WWI on 20th Century Genocide. <Need your opinion...>

Ghet for Prez · 12-08-2006, 04:48 PM

It's obvious you have to hide under some extremist definition of the word GENocide to give the illusion of argument. So let's make this simple:

BeeGee...

What group do you associate yourself as part of?

Race wise, nationality wise, religion wise?

Or are you "rebelliously" anti-association?

Ghet for Prez · 12-08-2006, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by holla!

there is no race that is being systematically annihilated through abortion. ghet i'm no longer going to read what you right in the same light. shame. until just now i thought you had things i could learn from, maybe even the only person on this site i thought that about.

If you can't see that race and age are the same methods of population categorization than your eye is superficial and not even worth my time.

Riz · 12-08-2006, 07:45 PM

Ghet, would you agree that you're anti-abortion for political rather than moral reasons?

I ask for no reason other than out of interest and to know exactly where you're coming from. I know you'll laugh at the suggestion of morals, but still...

Ghet for Prez · 12-08-2006, 09:43 PM

Here's the fun part: I never said I was anti-abortion.

In fact, I support wiping out entire populations before they have a chance to resist.

I also support marijuana, and alcohol. I support extreme drug consumption and depression. I support moral decadence. I support all of this because it is the perfect mechanism of self-moderated destruction. Why use police when people terminate themselves with much greater efficiency? No trails lead back to federal sources, no one is to blame, no agency is responsible. The government becomes seperate from the suffering... but reaps the benefits of a docile population none the less!

And the best part about that suffering?

Any attempts on intervention on that suffering is *VICIOUSLY* repulsed! This is what seals the deal to ensure that government has no responsibility to do anything and thus, eliminating expectation.

In the past, we had to go to war or ignore the effects of a disease to get the same effects we get from abortion. The problem was, people blamed people in power when this happened since the tragedy was shared amongst a single population.

But abortion is isolated tragedy. It hides under the guise of individualism and thus, legal and just. It destroys entire generations of future criminals, rebels, artists, and minorities long before they become a thorn in the side of the powers that be.

Guerillas always tell you their ideology is immune to destruction since information spreads to brains faster than bullets spread to bodies. What happens when you have convinced the females in your population to simply remove the brain before it can understand the information?

No more guerillas. :D

Oh yes, I support abortion. It forces those who resist liberalism to truly understand what they are up against.

BeEgEe · 12-08-2006, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghet for Prez

It's obvious you have to hide under some extremist definition of the word GENocide to give the illusion of argument. So let's make this simple:

BeeGee...

What group do you associate yourself as part of?

Race wise, nationality wise, religion wise?

Or are you "rebelliously" anti-association?

ya........

Your definition is the right one.

what was I thinking?

lol.

holla! · 12-08-2006, 11:10 PM

ladies and gentleman, little did we know we were sharing the same web space as thomas malthus himself. lol.

BeEgEe · 12-09-2006, 05:34 PM

I was amused as to where he was taking his argument.

BeEgEe · 12-10-2006, 08:11 PM

any critques of the paper?

Anidawehi · 12-10-2006, 10:06 PM

Ghet - I don't especially like BG, but he is right. Abortion is not genocide. There is no specific "target" in abortion. In order for something to be considered genocide there has to be a national, ethnic, religious group, etc for it to be genocide. Abortion is not "genocide" . . . it may be a mass murdering of human lives, but it is not a genocide.

It could be considered a "Holocaust" under the "New Definition" of the word, but not a Genocide.

Anidawehi · 12-10-2006, 10:10 PM

BG - I noticed (or maybe I missed it as I skimmed through your essay), you didn't mention the "Rape of Nanking." Did that situation have ties to WWI? If so, what were they?

BeEgEe · 12-11-2006, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anidawehi

BG - I noticed (or maybe I missed it as I skimmed through your essay), you didn't mention the "Rape of Nanking." Did that situation have ties to WWI? If so, what were they?

Nanking was extremely brutal.

Extremely.

And the torture cambers that were set up were as well.

but this is not recognized as a genocide either.

and this essay was only to contain Armenia, Germany, Yugoslavia and Rwanada.

Cambodia was not included..

Pol Pot wiped out 20% of the population in that genocide.

Ghet for Prez · 12-11-2006, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anidawehi

Ghet - I don't especially like BG, but he is right. Abortion is not genocide. There is no specific "target" in abortion. In order for something to be considered genocide there has to be a national, ethnic, religious group, etc for it to be genocide. Abortion is not "genocide" . . . it may be a mass murdering of human lives, but it is not a genocide.

It could be considered a "Holocaust" under the "New Definition" of the word, but not a Genocide.

Ther is no specific "target"?

Then why is it that the same age cateogry of people dies every single time to abortion? It is an intentional targetting of youth.

Ghet for Prez · 12-11-2006, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeEgEe

ya........

Your definition is the right one.

what was I thinking?

lol.

Way to not answer the question.

BeEgEe · 12-11-2006, 03:17 PM

using YOUR logic to twist my anwser, will not make YOUR definition of genocide correct.

You are 100% incorrect.
You need to do more research on the subject.

Genocide is very specfic. very.

This is not over your head Ghet.
Why are you being so stubborn?

Anidawehi · 12-11-2006, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeEgEe

Pol Pot wiped out 20% of the population in that genocide.

Eh?

I can see why you would say that abortion isn't genocide.
But the Rape of Nanking was Japanese raping and killing Chinese in mass numbers simply for being Chinese. If that isn't a genocide, what is?

Anidawehi · 12-11-2006, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghet for Prez

Ther is no specific "target"?

Then why is it that the same age cateogry of people dies every single time to abortion? It is an intentional targetting of youth.

The child isn't being "targeted," Ghet.
I'm against abortion . . . but nobody goes to get an abortion because they "hate and want to kill a baby." Get a grip, dude.

Anidawehi · 12-11-2006, 05:40 PM

Wrong thread . . . my bad

12-08-2006, 04:48 PM	#21 (permalink)
Ghet for Prez Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,970	It's obvious you have to hide under some extremist definition of the word GENocide to give the illusion of argument. So let's make this simple: BeeGee... What group do you associate yourself as part of? Race wise, nationality wise, religion wise? Or are you "rebelliously" anti-association? __________________ Note: No trees were killed in sending this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. Last edited by Ghet for Prez; 12-08-2006 at 04:49 PM.

12-08-2006, 09:43 PM	#24 (permalink)
Ghet for Prez Registered User Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 5,970	Here's the fun part: I never said I was anti-abortion. In fact, I support wiping out entire populations before they have a chance to resist. I also support marijuana, and alcohol. I support extreme drug consumption and depression. I support moral decadence. I support all of this because it is the perfect mechanism of self-moderated destruction. Why use police when people terminate themselves with much greater efficiency? No trails lead back to federal sources, no one is to blame, no agency is responsible. The government becomes seperate from the suffering... but reaps the benefits of a docile population none the less! And the best part about that suffering? Any attempts on intervention on that suffering is VICIOUSLY repulsed! This is what seals the deal to ensure that government has no responsibility to do anything and thus, eliminating expectation. In the past, we had to go to war or ignore the effects of a disease to get the same effects we get from abortion. The problem was, people blamed people in power when this happened since the tragedy was shared amongst a single population. But abortion is isolated tragedy. It hides under the guise of individualism and thus, legal and just. It destroys entire generations of future criminals, rebels, artists, and minorities long before they become a thorn in the side of the powers that be. Guerillas always tell you their ideology is immune to destruction since information spreads to brains faster than bullets spread to bodies. What happens when you have convinced the females in your population to simply remove the brain before it can understand the information? No more guerillas. :D Oh yes, I support abortion. It forces those who resist liberalism to truly understand what they are up against. __________________ Note: No trees were killed in sending this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

12-08-2006, 11:10 PM	#26 (permalink)
holla! kiss my d!ck Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,352	ladies and gentleman, little did we know we were sharing the same web space as thomas malthus himself. lol. __________________ F*ck you I don't know you.

12-09-2006, 05:34 PM	#27 (permalink)
BeEgEe El Warm Shot Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: miami fl Posts: 17,539	I was amused as to where he was taking his argument. __________________ * * * "Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it" -Ayn Rand-

12-10-2006, 08:11 PM	#28 (permalink)
BeEgEe El Warm Shot Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: miami fl Posts: 17,539	any critques of the paper? __________________ * * * "Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it" -Ayn Rand-

12-08-2006, 07:45 PM	#23 (permalink)
Riz Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: On the road to Rishikesh Posts: 6,641	Ghet, would you agree that you're anti-abortion for political rather than moral reasons? I ask for no reason other than out of interest and to know exactly where you're coming from. I know you'll laugh at the suggestion of morals, but still...

12-10-2006, 10:06 PM	#29 (permalink)
Anidawehi ICU Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 11,089	Ghet - I don't especially like BG, but he is right. Abortion is not genocide. There is no specific "target" in abortion. In order for something to be considered genocide there has to be a national, ethnic, religious group, etc for it to be genocide. Abortion is not "genocide" . . . it may be a mass murdering of human lives, but it is not a genocide. It could be considered a "Holocaust" under the "New Definition" of the word, but not a Genocide. __________________ The wise will always question the spoken message. The fool will always question the messenger speaking.

12-10-2006, 10:10 PM	#30 (permalink)
Anidawehi ICU Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 11,089	BG - I noticed (or maybe I missed it as I skimmed through your essay), you didn't mention the "Rape of Nanking." Did that situation have ties to WWI? If so, what were they? __________________ The wise will always question the spoken message. The fool will always question the messenger speaking.

12-11-2006, 03:17 PM	#34 (permalink)
BeEgEe El Warm Shot Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: miami fl Posts: 17,539	using YOUR logic to twist my anwser, will not make YOUR definition of genocide correct. You are 100% incorrect. You need to do more research on the subject. Genocide is very specfic. very. This is not over your head Ghet. Why are you being so stubborn? __________________ * * * "Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it" -Ayn Rand-

12-11-2006, 05:40 PM	#37 (permalink)
Anidawehi ICU Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 11,089	Psychiatric Disorders Wrong thread . . . my bad __________________ The wise will always question the spoken message. The fool will always question the messenger speaking.