is this what Ghet has been rambling about

[cock juggler]

If "pi" is the universe, metaphorically speaking of course, then all of the rules which applied to pi could be applied to the universe and all within.

Basically, I looked at pi as a infinite system like the universe (which is the only leap of faith I had to take because some people believe the universe in finite which I will discuss momentarily.) Because pi is the numeral epitome of such a system, it has laws that are self-contained within it. The major law of pi is that the numbers behind the decimal do not repeat yet goes on forever. Let us say that these numbers are representational of possible combinations of outcomes that occur in the universe. The implication follows that a person could conceive of any number, however big or small, and if it does not have digits that repeat, it will be definitely be found in pi. Consequentially, a person could conceive of any possible outcomes and it could definitely be found in the universe, as long as it stays within the confines of the universe. In other words, if you envision a place in the universe in which there is a planet ruled by O.J. Simpson then it mostly could be found. Everything conceivable happens in the universe, as long as it adheres the laws of an infinite system. Possibility becomes reality.

So, what if the universe was finite? This is something that David P. brought up when I first talked to him about it. Then the theory would still hold, yet instead of the universe being represented as a transcendental number, the universe and time would be represented as a rational number like .333333--. The universe is self contained within the single digit of the rational number. And , because time would be non-linear, the universe would just keep recreating itself. Everything that has happened, is happening, and will happen, will infinitely happen again and again and again, infinitely. We would live forever.


well Ghet?I heard about this before but only recently taken interest in it.everyone drop thoughts.

[Ghet for Prez]

I'm Shock Ed.

I just thought you were a troll this whole time!

This is a simplifcation of systems, which is... sort of not what I was speaking of.

Pi would have it's pattern, on the surface, evaluated as a decimal that repeats forever. This is not the case. Pi is much more unique.

Pi is when a circle's diameter is equal to 1, it's circumference is equal to Pi:



Also, Pi can never be a root to a polynomial. (equations combined via addition, subtraction, multiplication, and non-negative whole number exponents) This has implications in many math/philosophy relations, espeically field-oriented physics. What this means is that the molecular constants of nature (Heisenberg, Relativity, etc.) will naturally progresses on a polynomial basis, not through division of energy or negative energy values, therefore, solidifying the progression complex structure organization based on previous matter/infrastructure, and not symmetry. (Bye, bye M-Theory!)

The universe is a system, but due to limitations of light speed, not all parts of the system are aware (and, therefore, affect) of each other. Attempting to represent the universe as a whole number could be suggested as erroneous with this in mind.

Also, I want science to be refered to as "information philosophy" instead of "natural philosophy".

[BeEgEe]

3.14159265376????

i used to know that shit

[Leila Night]

Originally Posted by Ghet for Prez

This has implications in many math/philosophy relations, espeically field-oriented physics. What this means is that the molecular constants of nature (Heisenberg, Relativity, etc.) will naturally progresses on a polynomial basis, not through division of energy or negative energy values, therefore, solidifying the progression complex structure organization based on previous matter/infrastructure, and not symmetry. (Bye, bye M-Theory!)

I'm not surprised.
Again you take a complicated system to "disprove" an even more complicated system. Do you have a ph.D in theoretical physics? Please, say yes so that you may be taken seriously.

Are you saying "good-bye" to superstrings, as well?

god-complex.

[Ghet for Prez]

Supersymettry and string is *BACKGROUND DEPENDANT*

u lose

[BeEgEe]

def god complex

[Ghet for Prez]

... or whiny kids who are bitter they can't comprehend what is being said and automatically assume the usage of multisyllabic words connotates ego.

Sorry, I can't speak da guttah realness fa ya, dawg, I juss gotza uz da whyte man'z werds fa realzee

[BeEgEe]

ight pimp