View Single Post
Old 09-19-2008, 09:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
menaz
Avant Garde
 
menaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: ST.Louis, Mo.
Posts: 16,819
menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!menaz will do you doggie style!
"White privilege is being able to graduate near the bottom of your college class (McCain), or graduate with a C average from Yale (W.) and that's OK, and you're cut out to be president, but if you're black and you graduate near the top of your class from Harvard Law, you can't be trusted to make good decisions in office.

You're not running against Bush! Plus, it's completely irrelevant given the fact harry Truman, Andrew Jackson,William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland, Harry Truman never went to college. However, Truman was a World War 1 Hero. The fact obama is a liberal lawyer with a alinsky philosophy with a taste for marxism is exactly why he should not be trusted in office. or to make decisions in any office for that matter.

"White privilege is being able to sing a song about bombing Iran and still be viewed as a sober and rational statesman, with the maturity to be president, while being black and suggesting that the U.S. should speak with other nations, even when we have disagreements with them, makes you "dangerously naive and immature."

Mccain was joking, you tool. FDR and Reagan had the same sort of sense of humor.
While Mr.unwise is a tool a even bigger tool named obama actually wanted to meet
with iran without preconditions. That's rookie mistake 101.
Hot Air Blog Archive History re-written: Obama never said he would meet personally with Iran without precondition, says advisor; Update: Website excerpt added

"White privilege is being able to attend churches over the years whose pastors say that people who voted for John Kerry or merely criticize George W. Bush are going to hell, and that the U.S. is an explicitly Christian nation and the job of Christians is to bring Christian theological principles into government, and who bring in speakers who say the conflict in the Middle East is God's punishment on •••s for rejecting Jesus, and everyone can still think you're just a good church-going Christian, but if you're black and friends with a black pastor who has noted (as have Colin Powell and the U.S. Department of Defense) that terrorist attacks are often the result of U.S. foreign policy and who talks about the history of racism and its effect on black people, you're an extremist who probably hates America."

Black Liberation Theology:American Thinker: The Real Agenda of Black Liberation Theology
U.S. foreign policy did not create muslim extremism Qutbism created muslim extremism: American Thinker: Osama Bin Laden as Robin Hood? It doesn't matter what the USA does, did, or doesn't do. Before these people turned their sights on us these orginizations were trying to coup Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and India. These radical muslims have a bone to pick with democracy, islam that does not agree with their form of Islam, and other religions (such as the one in India) that will not accept dhimmitude. Their goal was to establish a global caliphate with their form of Sharia law. Colin powell just like Michael Scheuer did not fully understand Al-qaeda. Because they did not have all the evidence. Nor do either of them speak arabic. However, Raymond Ibrahim does. Their reasons are theological the black propaganda is U.S. foreign policy. YouTube - Al Qaeda Reader by Raymond Ibrahim on Hannity's America



"White privilege is being able to have a husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your state to secede from the Union, and whose motto is "Alaska first," and no one questions your patriotism or that of your family, while if you're black and your spouse merely fails to come to a 9/11 memorial so she can be home with her kids on the first day of school, people immediately think she's being disrespectful."

Her husband was only a registered member until 2002 but he never attended. It's no big suprise Mrs. obama dislikes america "for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country," she's been just as wacky as Todd palin in the past. So we have kooky significant others. And obviously palin's patriotism was question which is how the lies got started that Sarah palin was a memeber of ALP. Mrs.Obama was also up to little more than just that: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/michael...-9-11-ceremony And according to matt lauer we're not even allowed to question Mrs.obama's patriotism: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-w...mas-patriotism Just saying.


"White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of, then returned to after making up some coursework at a community college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to achievement."

eg.
president William Harrison - (attended college but never received a degree)
president Harry Truman – (went to law school but did not receive a degree)

Obama is smart but we're not just voting for the best college education here. If that where the case then Obama would have more college education in common with Bush. As you can see truman did do good in school and harrison didn't do good in college however that doesn't always mean we should just automatically assume only a harvard/yale educated type is best suited for POTUS.

However, sarah palin graduated college with a minor in political science. She might of failed but that doesn't make her a loser. There's a big difference between a loser and someone who failed. A loser never trys where as someone who has failed will try again until they have successed. And by trying again she did just that, successed. Alot of the founding fathers believed in the motto that a person should be allowed to fail only inorder to succeed.

I could go on and on busting up Tim unwise. But Tim unwise is a race-baiter spiting disinfo here. And I do find him a waste of time as well as mentally ill. It wasn't john mccain that said obama didn't look like one of the guys on the dollar bills. it was Obama himself. Mr.unwise should just come at people without the race, but he can't do that, otherwise his claims would be debunked on the spot. He also seems to like making stereotypes. Tim totally misses the point palin like obama is a minority. Though by gender not skin color of course. Which to me at least doesn't matter. I just don't agree with Marxism. I guess my "respect for the constitution" is showing. http://explorations.chasrmartin.com/.../palin-rumors/
__________________
"Spending for the common good" is not equitable to "spreading the wealth." Taxation for spending for the common good is paying a fee for services rendered. For example, I pay a tax and I get military/police/fire protection, infrastructure improvements, and mail services. Taxation for spreading the wealth is paying a fee for no services rendered. For example, I pay a tax and it goes in the form of a check to someone who pays no taxes.-menaz The Communist Manifesto's second plank is, "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax."-Marx & Engles http://www.reason.tv/roughcut/show/628.htmlJanuary 20th, 2009. A date which will live in infamy.

Last edited by menaz; 09-19-2008 at 10:25 AM.
menaz is offline   Reply With Quote