Rapmusic.com - View Single Post

menaz · 08-09-2008, 02:38 AM

Numman, this is OLD! Twoofer stupidty never ceases to amaze me, 7 years later and still not informed.

Omar Chatriwala, a journalist for Al Jazeera English, claims that he chose not to pursue the story at the time because it was an apparent slip of the tongue.

"While she did say what I (and now lots of others) thought she said, and which at first got me wondering what memo I had missed, what seemed evident, both from reading the transcript and re-watching the clip, was that she simply misspoke, meaning to say “the man who killed [WSJ reporter] Daniel Pearl” - which Omar Sheikh is accused of - in such a matter of fact tone, because it is well known."Bhutto and Bin Laden in the rumor mill | the synthetic jungle

Obviously Osama can't be dead if she is willing to help america target him in 2007.

It's Moot, Their is no evidence her comment is true. It's not even a matter of fact. More than likely she misspoke.

I welcome you to Jref.com anytime.

08-09-2008, 02:38 AM	#14 (permalink)
menaz Avant Garde Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: ST.Louis, Mo. Posts: 16,819	Numman, this is OLD! Twoofer stupidty never ceases to amaze me, 7 years later and still not informed. Omar Chatriwala, a journalist for Al Jazeera English, claims that he chose not to pursue the story at the time because it was an apparent slip of the tongue. "While she did say what I (and now lots of others) thought she said, and which at first got me wondering what memo I had missed, what seemed evident, both from reading the transcript and re-watching the clip, was that she simply misspoke, meaning to say “the man who killed [WSJ reporter] Daniel Pearl” - which Omar Sheikh is accused of - in such a matter of fact tone, because it is well known."Bhutto and Bin Laden in the rumor mill \| the synthetic jungle Obviously Osama can't be dead if she is willing to help america target him in 2007. It's Moot, Their is no evidence her comment is true. It's not even a matter of fact. More than likely she misspoke. I welcome you to Jref.com anytime. __________________ "Spending for the common good" is not equitable to "spreading the wealth." Taxation for spending for the common good is paying a fee for services rendered. For example, I pay a tax and I get military/police/fire protection, infrastructure improvements, and mail services. Taxation for spreading the wealth is paying a fee for no services rendered. For example, I pay a tax and it goes in the form of a check to someone who pays no taxes.-menaz The Communist Manifesto's second plank is, "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax."-Marx & Engles http://www.reason.tv/roughcut/show/628.htmlJanuary 20th, 2009. A date which will live in infamy. Last edited by menaz; 08-09-2008 at 02:42 AM.